• Home
  • About
  • Piqq.us Invite Feed
  • Links
  • RSS CULT
  • Dear Akismet: You Suck, And We’re Getting a Divorce

    Add to Mixx!

    Dear Akismet,

    Up until today, you have lived on my blog. We have lived in not what I would call harmony. I can fully accept that you now refuse to accept trackbacks from my blog; I am a naughty boy, and that is your job(although I will point out I don’t link spam blogs). But there are several aspects of your behavior that I just cannot accept, and will not allow on my blog.

    1. You catch only the spam that a monkey could catch. That’s right. I said it. You rarely catch anything of significance. 99% of the spam you catch, is actually amongst my blacklisted keywords anyways, and WELL over the maximum number of links I allow per post. They would be caught anyways. You’re the guard dog that only effectively stops the burglars that the police already have handcuffed. You allow a fair piece of other spam, that does NOT match those conditions to get through.
    2. You have a habit of stopping my friends from commenting. Every single day, you catch at least one person who I know personally, and who I KNOW is a whitehat, and who I KNOW doesn’t link spam. But no matter how many times I tell you they’re not spam, you insist that they are. Even Andy Beard has apparently been caught in your piece of shit software.
    3. I hate you and your blatant censorship of your own blog. When I make an intelligent, non-abrasive reply on your blog, where you proclaim “It really is spam“, you remove my comments on 3 separate occasions, just for having an opposing view. I’m sorry, but if I know someone personally, and know they don’t link spam, I am going to believe them over you. And you should let your readers know that mistakes happen. And by the way, I checked from a few different IPs, my comment showed. I did not get caught by their filters. It was explicitly removed.
    4. I understand not allowing my own trackbacks through; really, I do. However, when I trackback MY OWN BLOG, after having previously having un-spammed it, would it not be acceptable to store something in a database to remember that I have de-spammed them before?
    5. Do you not realize that shared hosting exists? If there are 400 domains on my server, and ONE of them submits a trackback that gets marked as spam(be it correctly, or incorrectly), must you take out the entire server? Why not cross reference? Like X domain has shown up using >10 IPs we have listed, so from now on, we list domain X. If it’s all coming out of one IP, and only for one domain you can easily just associate the IP with the domain, and spare the rest.
    6. Do you not realize that you are not infallible? I can de-list myself. You allow me to mark as not-spam. Cool. I can do that. But you have no appeals process, and a single “not-spam” does nothing to change this. It takes a lot. I have over 3200 wordpress/akismet enabled blogs out there I never got around to doing anything with. Do you really want to tempt me?
    7. Why do you block my VPS IP? My VPS hasn’t done anything to you. I was the first person to use that IP. Every comment from it was done manually. There is not a single piece of blackhat software on it. It, literally, is a copy of firefox, and a copy of apache/mySQL. I did not comment excessively. And yet I am listed.
    8. You block comments without a link in them. Why not let it at least hit my moderation queue? There’s not a lot of linkless spam, and I’m not an idiot.
    9. Do you realize what a terrible idea IP based blocking is? Try domains(hmm did this guy really post 1000 comments in under 5 minutes?). Try using some decent statistical filtering. Look at e-mail spam. The prevalence of ip-based blocking caused the spread of effin BOTNETS. That’s right. When we rely on it entirely, we get things like the storm worm, and spamthru. There’s PLENTY of ways to footprint spammy messages. Combining these approaches could stop a similar problem for link spam. Lycos spam filtering for example, can not only detect spam messages, but it can tell you what the topic is no matter how much the text is slaughtered. IP-Based blocks not necessary.

    In summary, you don’t block anything that would not be caught anyways, you block a lot of people who should not be, you censor your customers from opposing views, and you completely screw over anyone on shared hosting.

    No Love Lost,
    XMCP

    Important:
    If you agree, I’m asking people out there to link back to this article(if not from a blog, from a site elsewhere), with either the phrase “Akismet” or “Akismet Sucks” to serve as a warning to those who might be installing it in the future (The varying link text to throw off Google’s various detection algos) Oh yeah, and submit/sphinn this article wherever you please :-) (yeah, the censorship thing pissed me off)

    On a related note, SlightlyShadySEO will be switching hosting(or at least IPs), and anti-spam software sometimes in the next week. So if there’s a momentary down time, don’t sweat it.

    Peace Out,
    XMCP

    PS: On an unrelated note, check out the 30 Day Free Wordze Promotion that’s going on. Clicking the link in the entry helps to support SlightlyShadySEO, and also gets you guys a badass resource for site building.

    Share and Enjoy(You know you want to): These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
    • Technorati
    • StumbleUpon
    • Reddit
    • PlugIM
    • Blue Dot
    • Bumpzee
    • Simpy
    • Netscape
    • del.icio.us
    • blogmarks
    • Spurl
    • Furl
    • Fark
    • TailRank
    • BlinkList
    • NewsVine

    11 Responses to “Dear Akismet: You Suck, And We’re Getting a Divorce”

    1. Marty says:

      Dude…what do you suggest someone use for WP?…for Movable Type?… Please save my clients.

    2. admin says:

      @Marty: Nice to see you drop by!
      I honestly have no idea idea yet. I’m going to start changing spam filters very frequently, until I find one that I like. However, I wouldn’t be too opposed to just setting it so I have to approve the first comment anyone makes, and mix that with a basic setup to filter proxies(90%+ pass information indicating they’re proxies in the hearder).
      But that said, I’m going to do my best to find a better plug-in. I’ll keep you updated :-)

    3. Mat says:

      You should definitely give defensio.com a look…

      ;)

    4. arseabaska says:

      Cheep Viagra low cost generic no stickers almost low free sugar free pills 85 tabs 100 tablets dosage viagra tradamol viagra
      moola moola cash money wow i’m tired and manually fucking around to play with the akismet link spam detection. Did I mention buy discount viagra for erectily dysfunction? lol ;)

      Stick it to Akismet, bud!

    5. Matt says:

      You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about how Akismet works.

      Appeals process? If it doesn’t fix itself after a day or two, try the contact form:

      http://akismet.com/contact/

    6. admin says:

      @Matt:
      I know it eventually forgives you, but that’s not the point. I’m not sweating my own servers being listed. I’ll just change IPs, or mod wordpress to submit trackbacks via proxy.
      The point is that it DOESNT identify spam that’s remotely difficult to identify, and DOES identify my friends.
      That is a problem to me. Even if it’s temporary, next week, it’ll be a new friend.

    7. Matt Hopkins says:

      Shady,

      Nice blog, im a long time listener, first time caller. I put up a question on gooruze.com but no-one seems to want to answer. Thought the topic might be something you could shed some light on link:http://www.gooruze.com/questions-and-answers/discussion/113168/hypothetical-question-what-is-the-best-way-to-link-a-splog-farm/

      Hope you can help my inquiring mind :)

    8. admin says:

      @Matt Hopkins:
      I’m on it :-)

    9. Erica says:

      Great post…whenever I get a sharp spike in traffic I have to pay extra close attention to my akismet spam…and you’re right, it seems to never learn…

    10. Anthony a.k.a. OldSchool says:

      I have to thank you for this post and for helping me re-evaluate my options for controlling blog spam. I was getting ready to implement Askimet.

    11. Dr. Mike Wendell says:

      RE: #3 the censorship: It’s a known issue that Matt and the rest of Automattic censor the content on their blogs and within their support forums. They’ve admitted to it a couple of times but yet present themselves as being pro-Free Speech to the public and the media.

      The other issue is that it’s easy as pie for them to block access to the Akismet servers if they don’t like you. This was done to me and to a large percentage of my hosting clients even though Matt stated publicly that we weren’t blocked. That was the last straw for Akismet and we removed it from all of our servers. Working on a local solution that works around Spam Assassin now. We can see what gets caught by mistake and make adjustments.

      Matt’s link to the “appeal” is just butt covering. It’s well known that folks rarely get a response from submitting that form.

    Leave a Reply

    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

    Marketing & SEO Blogs - Blog Top Sites
    © Slightly Shady SEO, All Rights Reserved. Scrape me, and I will eat your soul.