<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ultimate Wordze Keyword Tool Review and Tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/</link>
	<description>Blackhat is Back, Baby.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>Wordze is a nice tool but lately I haven&#039;t been satisfied with it or the other keyword tools out there so I developed my own better program. It&#039;s called WordButler and I thought you might want to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordze is a nice tool but lately I haven&#8217;t been satisfied with it or the other keyword tools out there so I developed my own better program. It&#8217;s called WordButler and I thought you might want to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lovely Anchor Text/Domain Shuffler Script : Slightly Shady SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lovely Anchor Text/Domain Shuffler Script : Slightly Shady SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>[...] The Ultimate Wordze Keyword Tool Review and Tutorial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Ultimate Wordze Keyword Tool Review and Tutorial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>@firred: I think I demonstrated with this entry the strengths of it. Someday, I&#039;ll try and put together a review of all the tools.
But while WordZe does have a generous affiliate program, I do NOT review any product I would not use myself. I&#039;m a member of wordtracker&#039;s affiliate program. But you do not see links about it on here. Because I do not use it.
WordZe meanwhile, I honestly love. I&#039;m integrating into all of my autogen software, and have been able to find niches with it that have been more than profitable, and that I never found with overture or any other software I&#039;ve used.

It&#039;s important to me to keep reader trust in my reviews up. My logic is that if I&#039;m honest, and people like the tools they choose to buy, then they&#039;ll buy more in the future since I only recommend quality products. At least that would be my hope.
Take a look at the features here; Wordze is no joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@firred: I think I demonstrated with this entry the strengths of it. Someday, I&#8217;ll try and put together a review of all the tools.<br />
But while WordZe does have a generous affiliate program, I do NOT review any product I would not use myself. I&#8217;m a member of wordtracker&#8217;s affiliate program. But you do not see links about it on here. Because I do not use it.<br />
WordZe meanwhile, I honestly love. I&#8217;m integrating into all of my autogen software, and have been able to find niches with it that have been more than profitable, and that I never found with overture or any other software I&#8217;ve used.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to me to keep reader trust in my reviews up. My logic is that if I&#8217;m honest, and people like the tools they choose to buy, then they&#8217;ll buy more in the future since I only recommend quality products. At least that would be my hope.<br />
Take a look at the features here; Wordze is no joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firred</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>firred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>Hey there XMCP,

I&#039;ve read on a bunch of other SEO-related blogs that Wordze is not all that great and there&#039;s some speculation that all this buzz about Wordze is due more the generous affilate program than the tool itself.

I haven&#039;t actually used any of these types of tools, but something I think lots of people would like to see, and something that would be especially useful to us noobs would be an apples-to-apples comparison of Wordze, Keyword Elite, and KeywordDiscovery, with metrics and all. (these may or may not be the best or most popular 3 keyword tools - they&#039;re just the one I&#039;ve seen the most comments about).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there XMCP,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read on a bunch of other SEO-related blogs that Wordze is not all that great and there&#8217;s some speculation that all this buzz about Wordze is due more the generous affilate program than the tool itself.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t actually used any of these types of tools, but something I think lots of people would like to see, and something that would be especially useful to us noobs would be an apples-to-apples comparison of Wordze, Keyword Elite, and KeywordDiscovery, with metrics and all. (these may or may not be the best or most popular 3 keyword tools &#8211; they&#8217;re just the one I&#8217;ve seen the most comments about).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Nothing that shows search volume, aside from Wordtracker&#039;s pansy 10 free keywords setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing that shows search volume, aside from Wordtracker&#8217;s pansy 10 free keywords setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-998</guid>
		<description>You had an earlier post that checked a niche&#039;s saturation, using Overture and Google and coming up with a ratio.  Since Overture is gone, seems Wordze more than adequately substitutes.  But is there a freebie word tool out there as well than you can recommend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had an earlier post that checked a niche&#8217;s saturation, using Overture and Google and coming up with a ratio.  Since Overture is gone, seems Wordze more than adequately substitutes.  But is there a freebie word tool out there as well than you can recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-987</guid>
		<description>Trellian? No, I&#039;ll take a look though.
And thanks for the signup!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trellian? No, I&#8217;ll take a look though.<br />
And thanks for the signup!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-985</guid>
		<description>Heh I actually signed up through your affil link for the paid version, figured its the least I can do with all your quality content you pump out.

Good to know thats a daily limit. 

Do you have much exp. with trellians keyword tool?

I am not so certain that some of these &quot;keywords&quot; I am trying have no data for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh I actually signed up through your affil link for the paid version, figured its the least I can do with all your quality content you pump out.</p>
<p>Good to know thats a daily limit. </p>
<p>Do you have much exp. with trellians keyword tool?</p>
<p>I am not so certain that some of these &#8220;keywords&#8221; I am trying have no data for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-984</guid>
		<description>@Daniel: Don&#039;t sweat it.
Those are DAILY limits, and are more than 99% of people will use. In fact, I didn&#039;t even notice it until you mentioned(I&#039;ve never hit the limit).
WordZe is a really resource intensive tool on their end, and the limitations are very needed.
Sorry for not notcing, and hope all is well.
At least it&#039;s still free :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel: Don&#8217;t sweat it.<br />
Those are DAILY limits, and are more than 99% of people will use. In fact, I didn&#8217;t even notice it until you mentioned(I&#8217;ve never hit the limit).<br />
WordZe is a really resource intensive tool on their end, and the limitations are very needed.<br />
Sorry for not notcing, and hope all is well.<br />
At least it&#8217;s still free <img src='http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/the-ultimate-wordze-keyword-tool-review-and-tutorial/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/?p=157#comment-983</guid>
		<description>Stats: User: --- &#124; Keyword Searches: 22/3000 &#124; Digs: 1/25 &#124; WordRank Searches: 2/20 &#124; load average: 1.27, 1.90, 1.92

I signed up and cannot figure out what all this means. Does this mean I am limited in the # of searches, digs, wordranks I can use?

Is it per month?

Per year?

It dosen&#039;t say anywhere on the site.

If so that kind of sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stats: User: &#8212; | Keyword Searches: 22/3000 | Digs: 1/25 | WordRank Searches: 2/20 | load average: 1.27, 1.90, 1.92</p>
<p>I signed up and cannot figure out what all this means. Does this mean I am limited in the # of searches, digs, wordranks I can use?</p>
<p>Is it per month?</p>
<p>Per year?</p>
<p>It dosen&#8217;t say anywhere on the site.</p>
<p>If so that kind of sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

