<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traffic From Google Image Search: Re-Claiming Your Visitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/</link>
	<description>Blackhat is Back, Baby.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revolvermänner</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-3833</link>
		<dc:creator>Revolvermänner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-3833</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of possibilities to get some good Google image traffic. If you decide to put some code on your website, it is important to always monitor the Google reaction, because the fact that some trick functions today doesn&#039;t mean that you couldn&#039;t get some serious penality tomorrow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of possibilities to get some good Google image traffic. If you decide to put some code on your website, it is important to always monitor the Google reaction, because the fact that some trick functions today doesn&#8217;t mean that you couldn&#8217;t get some serious penality tomorrow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultimate SEO Guide to Google Image</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultimate SEO Guide to Google Image</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2729</guid>
		<description>[...] Some websites use this technique to keep the user on their page and not allow them to return to the Google Image serp listing. Google could not like this behavior and might remove your image from their index so I do not recommend it. Some people say it would not affect your listings but I&#8217;d be too afraid to try it out! You can find more info about Breaking the Google Image frame Here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some websites use this technique to keep the user on their page and not allow them to return to the Google Image serp listing. Google could not like this behavior and might remove your image from their index so I do not recommend it. Some people say it would not affect your listings but I&#8217;d be too afraid to try it out! You can find more info about Breaking the Google Image frame Here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2689</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2689</guid>
		<description>Is not that you lose Google Image traffic. It will appear under direct traffic instead of &quot;images.google.com&quot;, so it loses the referral part because of the frame breaker. At least that&#039;s what I&#039;m noticing in one of my sites: I search for one of my pictures, click on them, the frame breaker quicks in and my stats counter shows it like &quot;no referral&quot;. Don&#039;t know if I making any sense here, English isn&#039;t my first language :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is not that you lose Google Image traffic. It will appear under direct traffic instead of &#8220;images.google.com&#8221;, so it loses the referral part because of the frame breaker. At least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m noticing in one of my sites: I search for one of my pictures, click on them, the frame breaker quicks in and my stats counter shows it like &#8220;no referral&#8221;. Don&#8217;t know if I making any sense here, English isn&#8217;t my first language <img src='http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landwehr Online Reputation Management</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Landwehr Online Reputation Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wie man die Google Bildersuche austrickst...&lt;/strong&gt;

Die Bildersuche von Google bringt den meisten Webmastern nicht viel mehr als Traffic, Traffic der nicht konvertiert. Doch mit ein paar kleinen Tricks l&#228;sst sich dieser Traffic sehr gut zu Geld machen.
Die Google Bildersuche austricksen
Der Slightl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wie man die Google Bildersuche austrickst&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Die Bildersuche von Google bringt den meisten Webmastern nicht viel mehr als Traffic, Traffic der nicht konvertiert. Doch mit ein paar kleinen Tricks l&#228;sst sich dieser Traffic sehr gut zu Geld machen.<br />
Die Google Bildersuche austricksen<br />
Der Slightl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cash Volume</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2289</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash Volume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2289</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using this technique for quite a while now and still getting butt loads of traffic from google image search. Works particularly well with funny image sites and adult sites....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using this technique for quite a while now and still getting butt loads of traffic from google image search. Works particularly well with funny image sites and adult sites&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>Amending the entry to include external JS. My site is still live though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amending the entry to include external JS. My site is still live though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poto</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>poto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2168</guid>
		<description>in tests I&#039;ve done with frame breakers, it seems to actually kill off my image search traffic... my guess is google is aware of the code and drops sites that it finds that code on... obfuscated code might help, didn&#039;t try that one myself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in tests I&#8217;ve done with frame breakers, it seems to actually kill off my image search traffic&#8230; my guess is google is aware of the code and drops sites that it finds that code on&#8230; obfuscated code might help, didn&#8217;t try that one myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0nkeymafia</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>m0nkeymafia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>Cheers XMCP [what does that stand for btw?]

Can we look forward to a post on gaming / optimizing for google images?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers XMCP [what does that stand for btw?]</p>
<p>Can we look forward to a post on gaming / optimizing for google images?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tehbeermang</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2136</link>
		<dc:creator>tehbeermang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2136</guid>
		<description>This is a great article. Puts the final piece of a puzzle together for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. Puts the final piece of a puzzle together for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .W.</title>
		<link>http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slightlyshadyseo.com/index.php/traffic-from-google-image-search-re-claiming-your-visitors/#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>I was getting 600 hits a day with this just before last xmas as I ranked first image in google for a &quot;present&quot; - really works but the bigger popularity words do get rejigged quite often if your completely bogus.

Also the first two people in that photo are Chris Moiles and Dude from foo fighters?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was getting 600 hits a day with this just before last xmas as I ranked first image in google for a &#8220;present&#8221; &#8211; really works but the bigger popularity words do get rejigged quite often if your completely bogus.</p>
<p>Also the first two people in that photo are Chris Moiles and Dude from foo fighters?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

